If you have any needs pls contact me-
Whatsapp number of Ivy: +86 18933516049 (My Wechat +86 18933510459)
Email me: 01@songhongpaper.com
Paper towels-including roll towels, facial tissues, and napkins-intended for direct contact with the face or mouth must be manufactured exclusively from virgin (non-recycled) fiber sources. National standard GB/T 20808–2011 explicitly prohibits the use of recycled paper, reclaimed paper products, or any other fibrous recycled materials in the production of hygiene papers intended for oral or facial use. Specifically, only paper towels made from 100% virgin wood pulp comply with regulatory requirements for napkin-grade applications. Such products exhibit superior flexibility, fine fiber structure, high tensile strength, and low linting-properties essential for safe post-meal use on dining surfaces. It is therefore inaccurate-and potentially unsafe-to assume functional interchangeability among handkerchief tissues, soft roll towels, and napkin papers based solely on appearance or common nomenclature.
Raw Material Classification and Characteristics:
1. Virgin Wood Pulp: Fiber derived directly from freshly harvested timber via mechanical and chemical pulping (e.g., kraft or sulfite processes), without prior use or recycling. This pulp contains no secondary fibers or additives, ensuring high purity, consistent quality, and minimal allergenic risk. Tissues labeled "100% virgin wood pulp" meet stringent raw material traceability and safety benchmarks.
2. General Wood Pulp (unqualified as "virgin"): The absence of the term "virgin" indicates insufficient specification regarding fiber origin. Such pulp may include recycled content-e.g., deinked waste paper pulp-and does not guarantee compliance with hygiene-critical applications. Under GB/T 20808–2011, toilet paper labeled merely as "wood pulp" requires verification of its virgin status; otherwise, it may fail to satisfy mandatory safety criteria.
3. Non-Wood Pulps: Includes bamboo pulp, straw pulp (e.g., wheat straw), bagasse (sugarcane residue), cotton linter pulp, reed pulp, and bamboo-derived pulp. While bamboo pulp offers environmental advantages due to shorter crop cycles and lower land-use intensity, its inherent fiber rigidity may compromise softness and absorbency relative to premium wood pulp. Straw- and bagasse-based pulps typically yield cost-effective but lower-strength tissues, often exhibiting reduced wet tensile strength and higher dust generation.
4. "True Virgin Wood Pulp Paper": Refers to tissue products manufactured from high-grade, fully bleached or elemental chlorine-free (ECF) virgin wood pulp, processed under controlled conditions to ensure uniform fiber dispersion, smooth surface finish, and optimal sheet integrity. Substandard alternatives-despite labeling claims-may utilize inferior base paper with short fibers, excessive voids, poor formation, and inadequate bonding. These defects manifest as rough texture, rapid disintegration, high linting, and residual fiber shedding during use-compromising both user experience and hygienic safety.
Chemical Additives: Regulatory Status and Risk Considerations
• Talcum Powder: Permitted in trace amounts during papermaking to aid resin removal and improve machine runnability. Its presence is common across reputable manufacturers. However, excessive talc residues-often associated with non-compliant production-may pose inhalation or ingestion risks and impair sheet strength.
• Fluorescent Whitening Agents (FWAs): Widely employed in industrial bleaching to enhance brightness. While permitted in certain non-contact consumer goods (e.g., laundry detergents), GB/T 20808–2011 strictly prohibits migratory FWAs in facial tissues and napkins. Excessive FWA application not only violates regulatory limits but also raises toxicological concerns: chronic exposure has been linked in vitro and in animal studies to phototoxicity, cellular oxidative stress, and potential genotoxic effects. Ingestion-particularly via oral contact with contaminated napkins-must therefore be rigorously avoided.
• Fillers (e.g., Calcium Carbonate, Titanium Dioxide): Not to be confused with fluorine (a frequent misnomer in informal discourse), these inert mineral additives are used sparingly to adjust opacity or bulk. However, unregulated overuse-especially of low-grade fillers-can severely degrade wet strength, water absorption capacity, and structural cohesion. Overfilled toilet paper may appear voluminous and soft but performs poorly in practice, exhibiting rapid disintegration and negligible absorbency.
Critical Safety Guidelines for Consumers:
1. Toilet paper is not suitable for use as a napkin or facial tissue. Only certified sanitary napkins or facial tissues bearing explicit compliance statements (e.g., "for oral contact," "GB/T 20808–2011 compliant") should be used near the mouth or eyes.
2. Never use toilet paper to wipe the eyes: Ocular mucosa is highly permeable; even trace contaminants may induce irritation or infection.
3. Avoid excessively bright-white products: Naturally ivory-toned virgin wood pulp paper reflects absence of excessive optical brighteners. Abnormal whiteness strongly suggests超标 (exceeding permissible levels) of FWAs.
4. Reject products with unpleasant odors: Off-odors often indicate microbial contamination (e.g., elevated total bacterial count) or aggressive chemical disinfection-both red flags for substandard raw materials (e.g., unprocessed wheat straw or degraded waste paper). Residual volatile compounds may trigger respiratory or dermatological reactions.
5. Avoid low-strength, low-density products: High-quality virgin wood pulp tissues demonstrate uniform sheet formation, minimal dusting, and resistance to tearing-even when wet. Irregular perforations, surface fuzz, or powder shedding signal compromised fiber integrity and inadequate manufacturing controls.
6. Prioritize transparent labeling: Legitimate manufacturers provide complete, legible packaging information-including hygiene permit number, registered manufacturer address, postal code, customer service contact, and declared product standard (e.g., GB/T 20808–2011 or GB 15979–2002). Absence or ambiguity in such details undermines traceability and regulatory accountability.
